TAMS: Airport Terminals (ca. 1969)

9.95

28-page study comparing 31 airport terminals–24 in the US and 7 international ones. This is a digital, high-quality scan from the original report. See low-res product images for examples.

High-quality digital download.                                                                                                                                                                                                                      For personal use only. If you require these materials for any other purposes please contact us at [email protected]. Downloaded file will not contain AirportHistory watermark as shown in the preview.

Description

Prepared by legendary engineering consultants Tibbets-Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton (TAMS), the study compares different aspects of airport terminals–mostly existing terminals, some proposed–such as size, number of gates, walking distances, and number of enplanements. Foreign airports covered: AMS, CPH, LGW, LHR, ORY, FCO, HND. US airports covered: ATL, DTW, ORD, IAH, MCI (new), LAX, MEM, MIA, EWR, JFK (all terminals), LGA, PIT (proposed midfield), SFO (proposed expansion), SEA, TPA and IAD. Although it is a high-quality, accurate study, it has some interesting little quirky mistakes in it. For example, DTW is referred to as “Willow Run Airport” and the ATL and ORD layouts are transposed.

This document has been scanned at the highest possible quality.

The library contains a fraction of the items in the AirportHistory.org archives. If there something specific you are looking for, please contact us at [email protected]

We are happy to provide discounts for large orders. Please contact us at [email protected] to let us know which items you are interested in.

Important note: All the revenues coming from the library are used to keep the website running and to expand the archive. This library is NON-profit.

Number of pages28
File typePDF
File size16.90MB

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.